190510. Happy Birthday Jim Kiraly.

Today is Jim Kiraly's 86th birthday. It's an impressive age for an impressive man.

I've been coming to terms with the fact that Jim will probably die from natural causes be­fore I can put him on the stand in Court.

The regrettable fact of my abuser's short-term demise won't stop me from do­ing what's pos­si­ble until he goes.

And after he's packed his bags and moved to the un­dis­cover­ed country, there will be others to demonstrate love and affection to. For decades to come.

Well, 1.5 decades. I should last that long. If Jim's prosecutable crimes didn't manage to kill me, they must have made me stronger. So, I'll dance with delight to the finish line. :)

Additionally, the facts of the matter will outlive me. I'll take steps to ensure that.

The other day, a courier, a polite and conscientious woman, established that Jim and Grace were both still alive. In fact, she met the couple face to face.

The courier was there to deliver a birthday let­ter and a nice bottle of wine.

Jim Kiraly, SSN 038-20-8134, for his part, threat­en­ed the courier, because that's what violent abusers do.

Note: These sites enthusiastically dis­tri­bute, for le­gi­ti­mate and reason­able purposes that are pro­tect­ed under U.S. laws, SSNs and other in­forma­tion related to parties in­volved in a diverse and impressive col­lec­tion of prosecutable crimes.

Attorneys and others are invited to view the Legitimate and Reasonable Purposes List at this link:

https://haggishell.com/infopurposes.html

I'd thought that my father James Francis Kiraly, mother's maiden name Ann Varsa, might be civil to a calm and polite woman. However, it sounds as though he was scarcely able to refrain from punching her.

Just as Jim's own father Frank punched Ann through a glass door when Jim was age 4 and provided the example that Jim internalized for a long and unpleas­ant lifetime.

While Jim Kiraly was ranting and making threats, his victim Grace Kiraly, SSN 556-40-1879, sign­ed a short note which demonstrates that a polite effort was made to deliver a docu­ment to Jim and Grace, that on this occas­ion the couple's wish not to receive the docu­ment was re­spect­ed, and that Jim Kiraly's threats against the courier are there­fore potentially a prosecutable crime; i.e., the threat to commit the underlying crime of abuse of pro­cess.

The note that Grace Kiraly sign­ed and that might be suf­fi­cient to justify prosecution of her abuser Jim Kiraly is dis­play­ed below.

My next step, or one of them, will be to send, for le­gi­ti­mate and reason­able purposes that are pro­tect­ed under U.S. laws, a few thousand copies of the birthday let­ter to peo­ple residing in the vicinity of Jim Kiraly.

In add­i­tion to being pro­tect­ed under U.S. laws, this step and the in­forma­tion that it might lead to will con­tri­bute to posi­tive social goals.

Solvang is small compared to some cities. I be­lieve that this step will easily accomplish its pro­tect­ed pur­poses.

The docu­ment that I'll send to most of Solvang, CA will be an expanded version of the birthday let­ter that the courier was asked to deliver.

Third parties will need more context re­la­ted to the prosecutable crimes that Jim Kiraly, 636 Atterdag Road, Solvang, CA and his as­soc­i­ates have com­mit­ted.

However, for those who may be inter­est­ed, the first draft of the birthday let­ter that the couple declined to receive may be read at the link below:

190507_jim_kiraly.pdf

The PDF is 13 pages. I've writ­ten longer doc­u­ments related to the story. However, this one seemed just right for a goodbye let­ter to two peo­ple who mean as much to me as the avatars of Christ's pure love that are Jim and Grace Kiraly do.

The complex at 636 Atterdag Road, Solvang, CA either has mul­ti­ple names or houses mul­ti­ple divisions. The names or divisions include Solvang Lutheran Home, Atterdag Village, and Atterdag Care Center.

The Central Office for the complex is appar­ent­ly the receiving point for snail-mail. Which means that an interesting legal point has arisen.

A woman in Central Office claiming to be named “Sally” told the courier that my parents didn't live in the complex. So, “Sally” lied.

If the Central Office for Solvang Lutheran Home is registered as the receiving point for U.S. snail-mail to the complex, and practices such lies in that context, has a violation of reg­is­tra­tion with the USPO taken place? Or is it sim­ply impoliteness?

Inquiring minds will look into the issue.

My courier made it as far as the unit where Jim and Grace Kiraly resided due to a surprising coincidence. She had an uncommon name from past decades that hap­pen­ed to sound like the name of one of Grace's friends. The name confused my bio­log­i­cal mother and led to the courier receiving directions to the unit.

It was a once in a blue moon oc­cur­rence. One might wonder if divine intervention was in­volved.

The courier says:

“Upon [my] arrival Sally called them and asked if I could come to their apt. Your mom was on the other end of the line and she said yes. Apparently she thought I was her friend CoraLee.”

“When I got to the door and was not CoraLee — Dad was immediately sus­pi­cious. I gave him my card and informed him that I was a delivery ser­vice and was there to deliver wine and let­ter each — including that his in­clud­ed a bday message.”

“He insisted on knowing who it was from — once he knew — Dad would not accept the let­ter and threat­en­ed that he would have the DA file charges against me for harass­ment.”

OldCoder says: Jim was threat­en­ing to commit unambiguous abuse of pro­cess, which can be prosecuted as a crime. The threat to commit a crime might be treated, in and of it­self, as a crime as well.

The courier continues:

“He then got on the phone and told the office to never let my company deliver there again. While he was talking with the office I got your mom to sign a piece of paper refusing the let­ter. I then left. I stopped back in the office to see if a Doctor or Clergy could assist in the delivery — and Sally stated the official state­ment of the office is that nobody by that name lives there.”

OldCoder says: This seems odd if Sally is the one who called the couple to begin with. As noted further up, Sally might be in­volved in a violation of an agree­ment or reg­is­tra­tion with the USPO. It might actu­al­ly be a prosecutable crime.